What he omits to say is that taking down one or two major banks will also take down the entire financial system in the process, causing a bank run and chaos comparable with 1931. An irresponsible call for a bank run on December 7th is also being made by Max Keiser -- who admitted to selling his office space in the WTC just before 9/11 -- but Keiser also doesn't warn people that such a bank run will cause the immediate collapse of the economy, the closure of banks, leaving people without money or food.
Who benefits from such a catastrophe?
The euro is crumbling at an extraordinary speed. The break up of the eurozone could bring down the European Union and, in the process, its architects -- the powerful banks and dynasties like the Royal House of the Netherlands.
Engineering an economic collapse in order to implement emergency measures and even martial law might be one way of saving the eurozone and the European Union for the bankers and corporations.
Is Assange really a cointelpro agent about to carry out a "false flag" economic crime?
Anyone who looks at the current Wikileaks "revelations" finds mostly "gossip" or items often in the mainstream news. What is there really worth reporting? Why is this trivial news all over the front pages of the corporate controlled media and why is it being promoted by news outlets known to have been a part of the CIA's Operation Mockingbird to control information in the public domain?
We hear from the Wikileaks that Germany's Defence Minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg is considered a "good friend of America" But he is a member of the European Council of Foreign Relations, after all, so that is no surprise.
We learn that Prince Andrew cannot make up his mind whether to scold journalists and police for pursuing corruption or whether to scold countries like France for being corrupt. But he is a minor royal and never claimed to have a coherent world view.
We hear UN employees are spied on when it is pretty well known many are spies.
When I did a search through the Wikileaks data for items related to Austria, the only document that came up was a "cable" in which it was claimed that the Iranians were hiding plans for a nuclear reactor.
Because I had an acquaintance who worked for the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna sent as a cost free expert by te US government, I know that the assessment is that Iran's nuclear programme is civilian and poses little threat. Why no leak of such a document on Wikileaks?
The "cable" about the nuclear reactor only furthers the agenda of the Globalists, who want more war in the Middle East. They gave the corporate media an excuse to shift the focus from the eurozone crisis.
Have the controllers of Assange now decided to go one step further given the speed at which the eurozone is unravelling? Have they decided they must have martial law and fast? Who better placed to implement the false flag economic crime than Assange, who is being hounded by all the governments but who is never caught or stopped? How come Assange hasn't considered the consequences of taking down a bank or two and bringing the economic system to a standstill when no preparations have been made?
And why is Forbes magazine, the ultimate Globalist news outlet, cheerfully publishing Assange's warning he is about to put into the public data that will cause a bank run and collapse of the economy overnight - and crucially triggering emergency law or even martial law.
